“ 'to self the world' meets 'to world the self' ”

no enough words means we will always have too many

Now…then— “to self the world” and “to world the self” are not the same, not the same as in an identical tautology, nor a tautological identity. They are not a reversible reaction, even if they recursively feed themselves with outcomes. Their trajectories are bothered confoundedly, but in that they differ themselves. Ourselves.

However they are the same thing, the same meeting of ways, even when they oddly part. They are a reaming set of proportions, of ratios that relate their movements, more or less. This is then a fluid and reasonable analogy for living among others doing the selfsame thing, i.e (“ ‘to self the world’ meets to ‘world the self’ ”).

Now you and me, that’s the simple part. This is why we go on about it ourselves, me, you. We can handle it, easy, as it is near at hand, though for narcissists this is all they got, the only game they can play. They cannot be bothered to differ, dance the parting of the ways.

The ‘us’ is very complicated and we do not have enough words for it, this is why we keep making up new words, and the world expands to include them, making it ever more complex, and so still requiring ever more words.

Crossposted at substack.com.

See also a big list of posts on worlding.