why we should


¿what is the ethical response to morality? 

About

Why we should discusses what is broadly called moral philosophy. It does so on the assumption that evolution is key. The first essay which sets this out is (from 2019): Why we should : an introduction by memoir into the implications of the Egalitarian Revolution of the Paleolithic, or, Anyone for cake? RSS feeds feed.xml or feed.json If you wish…

Continue reading...

Casewell’s Jaspers, but meika’s Deleuzian Bergsonism. 

Self-care as salvation-- all authenticity but no responsibility Deborah Casewell in her aeon.co essay raises some notice on Karl Jaspers’ existentialist angst-mongering, how it has been mis-categorized (by Sartre) such that Jaspers as an inventor of the word existentialism he gave it away after losing control of the branding in the marketplace of ideas, but, Casewell reminds us, the “focus on the individual, the importance…

Continue reading...

The problem with empathy

(not mentioning Paul Blooms' against empathy today) I am refering to a recent article by Lucinda Holdforth “The Problem with Authenticity (and Other 21st Century Virtues).” (The Guardian, August 2, 2023, sec. Books. ) It’s an edited extract from 21st Century Virtues: How They Are Failing Our Democracy , published 1 August as part of Monash University Publishing’s In the National Interest…

Continue reading...